January 30, 2020
On December 11, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Peter v. NantKwest, Inc. (U.S. Supreme Court docket no. 18-801). In its unanimous decision, the Court held that the USPTO is not entitled to recover attorney’s fees from the opposing party in an action brought under Section 145 of the Patent Act.
The U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments this month in two trademark cases, Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashion Group Inc. (Supreme Court Docket No. 18-1086) and Romag Fasteners Inc. v. Fossil Inc. (Supreme Court Docket No. 18-1233).
January 2, 2020
The news provided on this website is intended to provide general information only and should not be construed as a legal opinion or as legal advice. Fildes & Outland disclaims liability for any errors or omissions and readers should not take any action that relies upon the information contained in this website. You should consult your own lawyer concerning your own situation and any specific legal questions. This website does not establish any form of attorney-client relationship with Fildes & Outland or with any of its attorneys.
© 2016-2020 Fildes & Outland